SUGGESTED READINGS

The following publication listings are not meant to be comprehensive. New suggestions are welcome and they will be added regularly.

Social Network Analysis | World Literature |  Digital Humanities and Critical Theories


Social Network Analysis          Back to top

  1. Algee-Hewitt, Mark. “Distributed Character: Quantitative Models of the English Stage, 1550– 1900.” New Literary History: A Journal of Theory and Interpretation, vol. 48, no. 4, 2017, pp. 751-782. ProQuest, https://search.proquest.com/docview/2022988938?accountid=14512. 
  2. Alhamami, Munassir. “Social Media for Language Teachers’ Development.” Arab World English Journal 4, no. 3 (2013), 183-192.
  3. Anderson, Sheila, and Tobias Blanke. “Taking the Long View: From e-Science Humanities to Humanities Digital Ecosystems.” Vol. 37, no. 3 (141), 2012, pp. 147–164., www.jstor.org/stable/ 41636602. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  4. Bazarova, Natalya N. and Yoon Hyung Choi. “Self-Disclosure in Social Media: Extending the Functional Approach to Disclosure Motivations and Characteristics on Social Network Sites.” Journal of Communication 64, no. 4 (2014), 635-657.
  5. Beshero-Bondar, Elisa, et al. “The Digital Mitford as Collaborative Database.” Liverpool University Press, 2017, pp. 137–195. “A Tribe of Authoresses”, www.jstor.org/stable/ j.ctt1ps32xn.10. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  6. Bingenheimer, Marcus; Hung, Jen-Jou and Simon Wiles. “Social Network Visualization from TEI Data.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 26, no. 3 (2011), 271-278.
  7. Brandes, Sigal Barak and David Levin. “‘Like My Status: Israeli Teenage Girls Constructing Their Social Connections on the Facebook Social Network.” Feminist Media Studies 14, no. 5 (2014), 743-758.
  8. Brígido-Corachán, Anna Maria and Marìa Goretti Zaragoza-Ninet. “What’s HappeNING? Expanding the ESL Classroom through Educational Social Network Sites.” In Digital Competence Development in Higher Education: An International Perspective, edited by Pérez Cañado, María Luisa and Juan Ráez Padilla. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2014.
  9. Buck, Amber. “Examining Digital Literacy Practices on Social Network Sites.” Research in the Teaching of English 47, no. 1 (2012), 9-38.
  10. Byle, Ann. “Building Buzz with Social Media.” Publishers Weekly 259, no. 7 (2012), 7-8.
  11. Cassidy, Anne Walke. “The Borgia Group Manuscripts: Postclassic Workshop Creations and a Social Network.” Latin American Indian Literatures Journal 26, no. 1 (2010), 59-98.
  12. Chen, Hsin-I. “Identity Practices of Multilingual Writers in Social Networking Spaces.” Language Learning & Technology 17, no. 2 (2013), 143-170.
  13. Conde-Silvestre, Juan Camilo; Pérez-Raja and Dolores Ma. “Multilingualism, Social Network Theory, and Linguistic Change in the Transition from Old to Middle English.” In Conceptualizing Multilingualism in England, c. 800-c. 1250, edited by Tyler, Elizabeth M. Turnhout: Brepols, 2011.
  14. Cooke, Louise and Hazel Hall, Hazel. “Facets of DREaM: A Social Network Analysis Exploring Network Development in the UK LIS Research Community.” Journal of Documentation 69, no. 6 (2013), 786-806.
  15. De Vos, Jan. “On Cerebral Celebrity and Reality TV: Subjectivity in Times of Brain Scans and Psychotainment.” Configurations 17, no. 3 (2009), 259-283.
  16. Desjardins, Renée. “Social Media and Translation.” In Handbook of Translation Studies, Volume 4, edited by Gambier, Yves and Luc Van Doorslaer. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2013.
  17. Dewey, Dan P., Ring, Spencer; Gardner, Daniel and Kirk R, Belnap. “Social Network Formation and Development during Study Abroad in the Middle East.” System 41, no. 2 (2013), 269-282.
  18. Dewey, Dan; Belnap, R. Kirk and Rebecca Hillstrom. “Social Network Development, Language Use and Language Acquisition during Study Abroad: Arabic Language Learners’ Perspectives.” Frontiers 22 (2012), 84-11.
  19. Di Leo, Jeffrey R. “Social Media and the Review.” American Book Review 33, no. 5 (2012).
  20. Dinnen, Zara. “‘Break Out That Perl Script’: The Imaging and Imagining of Code in The Social Network and Catfish.” European Journal of American Culture 32, no. 2 (2013), 173-186.
  21. Domínguez Barajas, Elías. The Function of Proverbs in Discourse: The Case of a Mexican Transnational Social Network. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2010.
  22. Earhart, Amy E. “The Digital Edition and the Digital Humanities.” Vol. 7, no. 1, 2012, pp. 18– 28., doi:10.2979/textcult.7.1.18. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  23. Emmelhainz, Nicole. “Status Update to Term Paper: Social Network Sites as Medium for Collaboration.” CEA Forum 42, no. 2 (2013), 97-108.
  24. Endres, Bill, and Jentery Sayers. “Making in the Digital Humanities.” University of Minnesota Press, 2017, pp. 44–54. Experiments in the Digital Humanities, www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/ j.ctt1pwt6wq.7. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  25. Ewing, Chatham. “Perspective: Social Networks and Historical Contexts.” Journal of Modern Periodical Studies 5, no. 1 (2014), 1-26.
  26. Fiormonte, Domenico. “Towards a Cultural Critique of the Digital Humanities.” Vol. 37, no. 3 (141), 2012, pp. 59–76., www.jstor.org/stable/41636597. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  27. Frangos, Mike.”Transmedia Beckett: Come and Go and the Social Media Archive.” Adaptation 6, no. 2 (2013), 215-229.
  28. Friendship and Social Networks in Scandinavia, c. 1000-1800, edited bySigurðsson, Jón Viðar and Thomas Småberg. Turnhout: Brepols, 2013.
  29. Frith, Jordan. “Social Network Analysis and Professional Practice: Exploring New Methods for Researching Technical Communication.” Technical Communication Quarterly 23, no. 4 (2014), 288-302.
  30. Gladney, Henry M. “Long-Term Digital Preservation: A Digital Humanities Topic?” Vol. 37, no. 3 (141), 2012, pp. 201–217., www.jstor.org/stable/41636605. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  31. Gourlay, Lesley. “Posthuman Texts: Nonhuman Actors, Mediators, and Technologies of Inscription.” Journal of Electronic Publishing, vol. 19, no. 2, 2016. ProQuest, https:// search.proquest.com/docview/2022984515?accountid=14512, doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3998/3336451.0019.203. 
  32. Gryc, Wojciech and Karo Moilanen. “Leveraging Textual Sentiment Analysis with Social Network Modeling: Sentiment Analysis of Political Blogs in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election.” In From Text to Political Positions: Text Analysis across Disciplines, edited by Kaal, Bertie; Maks, Isa; Elfrinkhof, Annemarie van; Vossen, Piek; Koller, Veronika and Alan Cienki. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2014.
  33. Henstra, Froukje. “The Problem of Small Numbers: Methodological Issues in Social Network Analysis.” In Current Issues in Late Modern English, edited by Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid and Wim van der Wurff. Bern: Peter Lang, 2009.
  34. Hoberek, Andrew. “The Anti-Social Network.” Contemporary Literature 52, no. 2 (2011), 370-378.
  35. Holt, Robert J. “Social Media and the ‘Perpetual Project’ of Ethos Construction.” Young Scholars in Writing: Undergraduate Research in Writing and Rhetoric 10 (2013), 72-80.
  36. Hunter, John, et al. “Reifying the Maker as Humanist.” University of Minnesota Press, 2017, pp. 130–138. Experiments in the Digital Humanities, www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1pwt6wq.17. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  37. Manovich, Lev, et al. “Cultural Analytics, Social Computing and Digital Humanities.” Amsterdam University Press, 2017, pp. 55–68. Studying Culture Through Data, www.jstor.org/ stable/j.ctt1v2xsqn.8. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  38. Jones, Bethan. “The Fandom Is out There: Social Media and The X-Files Online.” In Fan Culture: Essays on Participatory Fandom in the 21st Century, edited by Barton, Kristin M.; Lampley, Jonathan Malcolm and Stephen J. Sansweet. Jefferson: McFarland, 2014.
  39. Kelley, James A. “Social Network Sites and the Ideal L2 Self: Using Myspace in a Chinese EFL Class.” JALT CALL Journal 6, no. 1 (2010), 17-33.
  40. Khushu-Lahiri, Rajyashree and Urjani Chakravarty. “Social Networks as Practical Classrooms: A Study of Language Change and Its Impact on ELT.” ELT Research Journal 3, no. 1 (2014), 37-47.
  41. Kitzmann, Andreas. “That Different Place: Documenting the Self within Online Environments.” Biography 26, no. 1 (2003), 48-65.
  42. Klimanova, Liudmila and Svetlana Dembovskaya. “L2 Identity, Discourse, and Social Networking in Russian.” Language Learning & Technology 17, no. 1 (2013), 69-88.
  43. Lang, Anouk. “Exploring the Potential of Social Network Sites in Relation to Intercultural Communication.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 11, no. 1-2 (2012), 120-139.
  44. Leis, Adrian. “Encouraging Autonomy through the Use of a Social Networking System.” JALT CALL Journal 10, no. 1 (2014), 69-80.
  45. Mackey, Margaret. “Television and the Teenage Literate: Discourses of Felicity.”
    College English 65, no. 4 (2003), 389-410.
  46. Manovich, Lev, et al. “Cultural Analytics, Social Computing and Digital Humanities.” Amsterdam University Press, 2017, pp. 55–68. Studying Culture Through Data, www.jstor.org/ stable/j.ctt1v2xsqn.8. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  47. Masson, Eef, et al. “An Encounter between Epistemic Traditions.” Amsterdam University Press, 2017, pp. 25–38. Studying Culture Through Data, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1v2xsqn.6. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  48. McNeill, Laurie. “There Is No ‘I’ in Network: Social Networking Sites and Posthuman Auto/Biography.” Biography 35, no. 1 (2012), 65-82.
  49. Meskill, Carla and Joy Quah. “Researching Language Learning in the Age of Social Media.” In Contemporary Computer-Assisted Language Learning, edited by Thomas, Michael; Reinders, Hayo and Mark  London: Bloomsbury, 2013.
  50. Morrison, Aimée. “Some Things, You’re Better Off Not Knowing … Thoughts on RateMyProfessors.com.” English Studies in Canada 31, no. 4 (2005), 16-21.
  51. Ngai, Sianne. “Network Aesthetics: Juliana Spahr’s The Transformation and Bruno Latour’s Reassembling the Social.” In American Literature’s Aesthetic Dimensions, edited by Weinstein, Cindy; Looby, Christopher and Charles Altieri. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.
  52. Olvera-Lobo, María-Dolores and Juncal Gutiérrez-Artacho. “Academic Use of Custom Social Networks in Translation Training.” Perspectives 22, no. 2 (2014), 282-289.
  53. Page, Ruth. “Seriality and Storytelling in Social Media.” Storyworlds 5 (2013), 31-54.
  54. Polson, Erika. “Belonging to the Network Society: Social Media and the Production of a New Global Middle Class.” Communication, Culture & Critique 4, no. 2 (2011), 144-163.
  55. Rashley, Lisa Hammond. “‘Work It Out with Your Wife’: Gendered Expectations and Parenting Rhetoric Online.” NWSA Journal 17, no. 1 (2005), 58-92.
  56. Raufman, Ravit and Rachel Ben-Cnaan. “Red Riding Hood: Text, Hypertext, and Context in an Israeli Nationalistic Internet Forum.” Journal of Folklore Research 46, no. 1 (2009), 43-66.
  57. Resch, Gabby, et al. “Critical Making with Humanistic Concerns.” University of Minnesota Press, 2017, pp. 149–161. Experiments in the Digital Humanities, www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/ j.ctt1pwt6wq.19. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  58. Reyman, Jessica. “User Data on the Social Web: Authorship, Agency, and Appropriation.” College English 75, no. 5 (2013), 513-533.
  59. Rukavina, Alison. “‘We Can All Meet, Be It Soon or Late’: E. A. Petherick and His Scholarly and Publishing Social Network.” Mémoires du Livre/Studies in Book Culture 4, no. 1 (2012).
  60. Tafazoli, Dara and Erfan Jalali. “Social Networking: Using Facebook in Teaching English Idioms.” In ELT: Harmony and Diversity, edited by Haase, Christoph and Orlova. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2014.
  61. Toetenel, Lisette. “Social Networking: A Collaborative Open Educational Resource.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 27, no. 2 (2014), 149-162.
  62. Van Zundert, Joris. “If You Build It, Will We Come? Large Scale Digital Infrastructures as a Dead End for Digital Humanities.” Vol. 37, no. 3 (141), 2012, pp. 165–186., www.jstor.org/ stable/41636603. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  63. Venturini, Tommaso, et al. “Exploring the Narrative Affordances of Graphs with the Iliad.” Amsterdam University Press, 2017, pp. 155–170. Studying Culture Through Data, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1v2xsqn.16. Accessed 1 June 2018. 


World Literature           Back to top

  1. Aldridge, Alfred Owen. The Reemergence of World Literature: A Study of Asia and the West. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1986.
  2. Alfaisal, Haifa Saud. “World Reading Strategies: Border Reading Bandarshah.” Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics 34 (2014), 199-224.
  3. Ansaldo, Marina, and Neill O’Leary. “Reading East: Irish Sources and Resources.”ProQuest, Nov 29, 2017, https://search.proquest.com/docview/1477427051?accountid=14512. 
  4. Apter, Emily. Against World Literature: On the Politics of Untranslatability. London: Verso, 2013.
  5. Aravamudan, Srinivas. “East-West Fiction as World Literature: The Hayy Problem Reconfigured.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 47, no. 2 (2014), 195-231.
  6. Baker, James, et al. “A History of History through the Lens of Our Digital Present, the Traditions That Shape and Constrain Data-Driven Historical Research, and What Librarians Can Do About It.” Vol. 7, Purdue University Press, 2016, pp. 15–32. Digital Humanities in Academic Libraries, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt163t7kq.5. Accessed 1 June 2018.
  7. Bartoloni, Paolo. “World Literatures, Comparative Literature, and Global Cosmopolitanism.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 15, no. 5 (2013).
  8. Basu, Biman. “Postcolonial World Literature: Forster-Roy-Morrison.” Comparatist 38 (2014), 158-187.
  9. Beebee, Thomas Oliver, ed. German Literature as World Literature. New York: Bloomsbury, 2014.
  10. Beebee, Thomas O. “Introduction, Aimé Césaire and World Literature.” Comparative Literature Studies 50, no. 3 (2013), 413-414.
  11. Beecroft, Alexander. “Greek, Latin, and the Origins of ‘World Literature.'” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 15, no. 5 (2013).
  12. Belling, Catherine and Karen Thornber. “World Literature and Global Health.” Literature and Medicine 31, no. 2 (2013), vii-xxi, 177-331.
  13. Bernardi, Joanne, et al. “The Digital Archive as Argument.” University of Minnesota Press, 2017, pp. 187–197. Experiments in the Digital Humanities, www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/ j.ctt1pwt6wq.24. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  14. Bollen, Jonathan. “Data Models for Theatre Research: People, Places, and Performance.” Theatre Journal, vol. 68, no. 4, 2016, pp. 615-632. ProQuest, https://search.proquest.com/docview/ 1873703583?accountid=14512. 
  15. Braz, Albert. “World Literature and Translation.” Inquire: Journal of Comparative Literature 3, no. 1 (2013).
  16. Brown, Sterling Allen, ed. The Reader’s Companion to World Literature. New York: New American Library, 1956.
  17. Cavendish-Joens, “On National Traditions and World Literature: A Conversation with Zhang Longxi.” Atlantic Studies 11, no. 1 (2014), 145-156.
  18. Cheah, Pheng. “What is a World? On World Literature as World-Making activity.” Daedalus 137, no. 3 (2008), 26-38.
  19. Cheah, Pheng. “World against Globe: Toward a Normative Conception of World Literature.” New Literary History 45, no. 3 (2014), 303-329.
  20. Cottom, Tressie Mcmillan, et al. “Digitized Institutions and Inequalities.” Policy Press at the University of Bristol, 2017, pp. 139–146, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1t89cfr.15. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  21. Chun, Eunkyung. “’Finnegans Wake’: A Postmodern Vision of World Literature.” Journal of Irish Studies 30 (2015), 71-76.
  22. D’haen, Theo. “When ‘World Literature’ Becomes ‘World’ Literature.” Journal of English Language and Literature/Yongo Yongmunhak 59, no. 6 (2013), 915-926.
  23. Dagnino, Arianna. “Transcultural Literature and Contemporary World Literature(s).” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 15, no. 5 (2013).
  24. Damon, Cynthia, et al. “Some Digital Desiderata for the Critical Apparatus of Ancient Greek and Latin Texts.” Vol. 4, Open Book Publishers, 2016, pp. 201–218. Theories and Practices, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1fzhh6v.15. Accessed 1 June 2018.
  25. Damrosch, David, ed. World Literature in Theory. New York: Wiley Blackwell, 2014.
  26. Damrosch, David. “Comparative World Literature.” In The Canonical Debate Today: Crossing Disciplinary and Cultural Boundaries, edited by Papadima, Liviu; Damrosch, David and Theo D’haen. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2011.
  27. Damrosch, David. “World Literature in a Postliterary Age.” Modern Language Quarterly 74, no. 2 (2013), 151-170.
  28. Damrosch, David. What Is World Literature?. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.
  29. Del Turco, Roberto Rosselli, et al. “Should We Make a Case for Digital Editions?” Vol. 4, Open Book Publishers, 2016, pp. 219–238. Theories and Practices, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1fzhh6v. 16. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  30. Dev, Amiya. “The Mahabharata and World Literature.” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 32, no. 3 (2012), 470-476.
  31. Doherty, Brian. “The Center Cannot Hold: The Development of World Literature Anthologies.” Alif 34 (2014), 100-124.
  32. Dubrow, Heather, and Andrew Kopec. “Data Versus Literature? the Digital Humanities and Literary Studies.” PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, vol. 131, no. 5, 2016, pp. 1557-1560. ProQuest, https://search.proquest.com/docview/1873700876? accountid=14512, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2016.131.5.1557. 
  33. Edmond, Jacob. “Diffracted Waves and World Literature.” Parallax 20, no. 3 (2014), 245-257. In Special Issue: Diffracted Worlds-Diffractive Readings: Onto-Epistemologies and the Critical Humanities.
  34. Eoyang, Eugene. “The Persistence of ‘Cathay’ in World Literature.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 15, no. 5 (2013).
  35. Figueira, Dorothy. “Amerikanische Hintergründe. Zu einer (›unzeitgemäßen‹) Soziologie der sogenannten World Literature-Bewegung.” KulturPoetik 14, no. 1 (2014), 119-124.
  36. Figuren des Globalen: Weltbezug und Welterzeugung in Literatur, Kunst und Medien, edited by Moser, Christian, and Linda Simonis. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2014.
  37. Franzini, Greta, et al. “A Catalogue of Digital Editions.” Vol. 4, Open Book Publishers, 2016, pp. 161–182. Theories and Practices, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1fzhh6v.13. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  38. Friedman, Susan. “World Modernisms, World Literature, and Comparativity.” The Oxford Handbook of Global Modernisms, edited by Wollaeger, Mark and Matt Eatough. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
  39. Frydman, Jason. Sounding the Break: African American and Caribbean Routes of World Literature. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2014.
  40. Gillespie, Gerald. “Das Forschungsprogramm der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Vergleichende Literaturwissenschaft (AILC/ICLA) und die aktuelle Praxis einer globalen Komparatistik.” KulturPoetik 14, no. 1 (2014), 113-119.
  41. Ghoneim, Hala. “Imagined Audience and the Reception of World Literature: Reading Brooklyn Heights and Chicago.” Alif 34 (2014), 174-198. In Special Issue: World Literature: Perspectives and Debates / Adab al-‘alam: Ru’an wa muna?arat.
  42. Green, Harriett E., et al. “An Analysis of Student-Generated Multimodal Digital Scholarship.” Vol. 7, Purdue University Press, 2016, pp. 179–204. Digital Humanities in Academic Libraries, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt163t7kq.13. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  43. Hafez, Sabry. “World Literature after Orientalism: The Enduring Lure of the Occident.” Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics 34 (2014), 10-38.
  44. Hamilton, Grant. “On World Literature: When Goethe Met Boltzmann.” Textual Practice 28, no. 6 (2014), 1015-1033.
  45. Hartman, Michelle. “Teaching Mahfouz as World Literature.” Approaches to Teaching the Works of Naguib Mahfouz, edited by Hassan, Waïl S. and Susan Muaddi Darraj. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 2012.
  46. He, Chengzhou. “Rural Chineseness, Mo Yan’s Work, and World Literature.” In Mo Yan in Context: Nobel Laureate and Global Storyteller, edited by Duran, Angelica and Yuhan Huang. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 2014.
  47. Helgesson, Stefan. “Postcolonialism and World Literature: Rethinking the Boundaries.” Interventions 16, no. 4 (2014), 483-500.
  48. Henson, George. “Taking Their Place: Queer Lit in the Twenty-First Century.” World Literature Today 87, no. 5 (2013), 40-43.
  49. Hrach, Susan E. “Translation and the Future of Early World Literature.” Pedagogy 13, no. 3 (2013), 453-467.
  50. Kim, Jaecheol. “Cognitive Cartography in the Neocolonial World: Jameson’s ‘Third-World Literature’ and Ngũgĩ’s ‘Petals of Blood’.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 55, no. 2 (2013), 184-206.
  51. Klein, Julie Thompson, and Jentery Sayers. “The Boundary Work of Making in Digital Humanities.” University of Minnesota Press, 2017, pp. 21–31. Experiments in the Digital Humanities, www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1pwt6wq.4. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  52. Klein, Lucas. “Indic Echoes: Form, Content, and World Literature in Tang Dynasty Regulated Verse.” Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews 35 (2013), 59-96.
  53. Küpper, Joachim. Approaches to World Literature. Berlin: Akademie, 2013.
  54. Legg, Jannelle. “Exploring the Promise of Digital Deaf Histories.” Vol. 17, no. 1, 2016, pp. 42– 58., www.jstor.org/stable/26189127. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  55. Longxi, Zhang. “The Relevance of ‘Weltliteratur’.” Poetica 45, no. 3/4 (2013), 241-247.
  56. Macdonald, Graeme. “Oil and World Literature.” American Book Review 33, no. 3 (2012).
  57. Mani, B. Venkat. Recording World Literature: Libraries, Print Culture, and Germany’s Pact with Books. New York: Fordham University Press, 2017.
  58. Mani, B. Venkat. “World Literature in the Digital Century.” Fordham University, 2017, pp. 215– 242. Libraries, Print Culture, and Germany’s Pact with Books, www.jstor.org/stable/ j.ctt1fzhct7.10. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  59. Martin, Kim, et al. “Mobilizing Digital Humanities with the MakerBus.” University of Minnesota Press, 2017, pp. 251–256. Experiments in the Digital Humanities, www.jstor.org/ stable/10.5749/j.ctt1pwt6wq.32. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  60. Mattar, Karim. “Orhan Pamuk and the Limits of Translation: Foreignizing The Black Book for World Literature.” Translation & Literature 23, no. 1 (2014), 42-67.
  61. Melton, Sarah, et al. “Developing Digital Publishing Initiatives at the Emory Center for Digital Scholarship.” Vol. 7, Purdue University Press, 2016, pp. 95–110. Digital Humanities in Academic Libraries, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt163t7kq.9. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  62. Miller, Matthew T., Maxim G. Romanov, and Sarah Savant. “Digitizing the Textual Heritage of the Premodern Islamicate World: Principles and Plans.” International Journal of Middle East Studies, vol. 50, no. 1, 2018, pp. 103-109. ProQuest, https://search.proquest.com/docview/ 2040760749?accountid=14512. 
  63. Moretti, Franco. “Conjectures on World Literature.” New Left Review (2000), 54-68.
  64. Muñoz, Trevor, et al. “Recovering a Humanist Librarianship through Digital Humanities.” Vol. 7, Purdue University Press, 2016, pp. 3–14. Digital Humanities in Academic Libraries, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt163t7kq.4. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  65. Murphy, Timothy S. “To Have Done with Postmodernism: A Plea (or Provocation) for Globalization Studies.” Symploke 12, no. 1-2 (2004), 20-34.
  66. Nelson, Robert K. “Digital Humanities as Appendix.” American Quarterly, vol. 68, no. 1, 2016, pp. 131-136. ProQuest, https://search.proquest.com/docview/1826797253?accountid=14512. 
  67. O’Gorman, Marcel, and Jentery Sayers. “The Making of a Digital Humanities Neo-Luddite.” University of Minnesota Press, 2017, pp. 116–127. Experiments in the Digital Humanities, www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1pwt6wq.15. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  68. Pizer, John David. The Idea of World Literature: History and Pedagogical Practice. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2006.
  69. Pizer, John. “Goethe’s ‘World Literature’ Paradigm and Contemporary Cultural Globalization.” Comparative Literature 52 (2000), 213-227.
  70. Prawer, Siegbert Salomon. Karl Marx and World Literature. London: Verso, 2014.
  71. Prendergast, Christopher and Benedict Richard O’Gorman Anderson, eds. Debating World Literature. London: Verso, 2004.
  72. Rasmussen, Krista Stinne Greve, et al. “Reader Roles in Scholarly Editions.” Vol. 4, Open Book Publishers, 2016, pp. 119–134. Theories and Practices, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1fzhh6v.11. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  73. Ray, Sangeeta. “Imagining Otherwise: Comparative South Asian Literatures and the MLA.” Comparative Literature Studies 50, no. 2 (2013), 236-243.
  74. Rogers, Melissa, and Jentery Sayers. “A Transdisciplinary Makerspace for the Rest of Us.” University of Minnesota Press, 2017, pp. 234–248. Experiments in the Digital Humanities, www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1pwt6wq.30. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  75. Rohatgi, Rashi. Fighting Cane and Canon: Abhimanyu Unnuth and the Case of World Literature in Mauritius. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2014.
  76. Rubin, Andrew N. “World Literature: Perspectives and Debates.” Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics 34 (2014), 8-9.
  77. Sahle, Patrick, et al. “What Is a Scholarly Digital Edition?” Vol. 4, Open Book Publishers, 2016, pp. 19–40. Theories and Practices, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1fzhh6v.6. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  78. Saldivar, Ramon. “Comparting Modern Literatures Worldwide: The Transamerican View.” Comparative Literature Studies 50, no. 2 (2013), 199-203.
  79. Sanders, Leslie, Liam Rodrigues, and Kay Li. “Enhanced Student Engagement and Culturally Responsive Pedagogy: Innovations in the SAGITTARIUS–ORION–Shaw Literature Digitizing Pilot Project.” SHAW: The Journal of Bernard Shaw Studies, vol. 36, no. 2, 2016, pp. 272-289. ProQuest, https://search.proquest.com/docview/2010386855?accountid=14512, doi:http:// dx.doi.org/10.5325/shaw.36.2.0272. 
  80. Saussy, Haun, ed. Comparative literature in an age of globalization. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006.
  81. Schmitz-Emans, Monika. “Graphic Narrative as World Literature.” In From Comic Strips to Graphic Novels: Contributions to the Theory and History of Graphic Narrative, edited by Stein, Daniel and Jan-Noël Thon. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013.
  82. Scott, Bede. On Lightness in World Literature. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
  83. Shields, Kathleen. “Challenges and Possibilities for World Literature, Global Literature, and Translation.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 15, no. 7 (2013).
  84. Siskind, Mariano. Cosmopolitan Desires: Global Modernity and World Literature in Latin America. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2014.
  85. Slaughter, Joseph R. “World Literature as Property.” Journal of Comparative Poetics 34 (2014), 39-73. In Special Issue: World Literature: Perspectives and Debates / Adab al-‘alam: Ru’an wa muna?arat.
  86. Staley, David, and Jentery Sayers. “On the “Maker Turn” in the Humanities.” University of Minnesota Press, 2017, pp. 32–41. Experiments in the Digital Humanities, www.jstor.org/stable/ 10.5749/j.ctt1pwt6wq.5. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  87. Strich, Fritz.Goethe and World Literature. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1949.
  88. Tally, Robert T., Jr. “World Literature and Its Discontents.” Journal of English Language and Literature/Yongo Yongmunhak 60, no. 3 (2014), 401-419.
  89. Talvet, Jüri. “Towards a Symbiotic Coexistence of Comparative Literature and World Literature.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 15, no. 5 (2013).
  90. Thaller, Manfred. “From the Digitized to the Digital Library [2001].” no. 29, 2017, pp. 307–319., www.jstor.org/stable/44384259. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  91. Thomsen, Mads Rosendahl. “Strangeness and World Literature.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 15, no. 5 (2013).
  92. Thomsen, Mads Rosendahl. Mapping World Literature: International Canonization and Transnational Literatures. London: A&C Black, 2008.
  93. Tötösy de Zepetnek, Steven and Tutun Mukherjee ed., Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. New Delhi: Foundation, 2013.
  94. Vanwesenbeeck, Birger, and Mark H Gelber, eds. Stefan Zweig and world literature: twenty-first century perspectives. New York: Camden House, 2014.
  95. Van Zundert, Joris, et al. “Barely Beyond the Book?” Vol. 4, Open Book Publishers, 2016, pp. 83–106. Theories and Practices, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1fzhh6v.9. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  96. Varner, Stewart, et al. “Library Instruction for Digital Humanities Pedagogy in Undergraduate Classes.” Vol. 7, Purdue University Press, 2016, pp. 205–222. Digital Humanities in Academic Libraries, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt163t7kq.14. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  97. Wilson, Katherine. “Anne Frank Abroad: The Emergence of World Atrocity Literature.” World Literature Today 87, no. 3 (2013), 28-33.
  98. Younssl, Anouar El. “An Exoticized World Literature: Ben Jelloun at the Two Shores of the Mediterranean.” Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics 34 (2014), 225-250.
  99. Zhang, Longxi. “Qian Zhongshu (1910-1998) and World Literature.” Revue de Littérature Comparée 2, no. 346 (2013), 177-202, 258-259, 262.


Digital Humanities and Critical Theories            Back to top

  1. Allen, Colin. “Cross-cutting Categorization Schemes in the Digital Humanities.” Isis 104, no. 3 (2013), 573-583.
  2. Andrews, Tara L. “The Third Way: Philology and Critical Edition in the Digital Age.” Variants 10 (2013), 61-76.
  3. Antolik, Katelyn. Text Based Analysis in the Undergraduate Classroom, Duquesne University, Ann Arbor, 2017. ProQuest, https://search.proquest.com/docview/2008134110? accountid=14512. 
  4. Berry, David M., and Anders Fagerjord. Digital Humanities: Knowledge and Critique in a Digital Age. Polity Press, Oxford, 2017. ProQuest, https://search.proquest.com/docview/ 1924611612?accountid=14512. 
  5. Best, Stephen, Marcus, Sharon, Apter, Emily and Elaine Freedgood. “The Way We Read Now.” Representations 108 (2009), 1-148.
  6. Bianco, Jamie “Skye:The Digital Humanities Which Is Not One.” Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Gold, Matthew K. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2012.
  7. Bluma, Jennifer R. Digital Divide, Or ‘Digital Hegemony?’ an Ideological Criticism of ‘Digitality,’ Communication ‘Acceptability,’ and the Right to Non-Digitality in an Age of Posthuman Communication through the Postcolonial Perspective of Stanley Deetz’s Discursive Closure, Regent University, Ann Arbor, 2016. ProQuest, https://search.proquest.com/docview/ 1842260199?accountid=14512. 
  8. Brugger, Niels. “Digital Humanities in the 21st Century: Digital Materials as a Driving Force.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 10, no. 3 (2016). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/10/3/000256/000256.html
  9. Boyle, Jen. “Treading the Digital Turn: Mediated Form and Historical Meaning.” Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 13, no. 4 (2013), 79-90.
  10. Carlson, John Ivor. “Translating the Alliterative Morte Arthure into a Digital Medium: The Influence of Physical Context on Editorial Theory.” Arthuriana 20, no. 2 (2010), 28-44.
  11. Carter, Shannon and Kelly L. Dent. “East Texas Activism (1966-68): Locating the Literacy Scene through the Digital Humanities.” College English 76, no. 2 (2013), 152-170.
  12. Ceraso, Antonio and Jeff Pruchnic. “Open Source Culture and Aesthetics.” Criticism 53, no. 3 (2011), 337-515.
  13. Citton, Yves. “Reading Literature and the Political Ecology of Gestures in the Age of Semiocapitalism.” New Literary History 44, no. 2 (2013), 285-308.
  14. Clement, Tanya, Wendy Hagenmaier, and Jennie Levine Knies. “Toward a Notion of Archive of the Future: Impressions of Practice by Librariians, Archivists, and Digital Humanities Scholars.” The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy 83, no. 2 (2013), 112-130.
  15. Colebrook, Claire. “The Context of Humanism.” New Literary History 42, no. 4 (2011), 701-718.
  16. Collins, Jim. “The Use Values of Narrativity in Digital Cultures.” New Literary History 44, no. 4 (2013), 639-660.
  17. Coombs, Nicolás López, et al. “Towards a Reflexive Digital Data Analysis.” Amsterdam University Press, 2017, pp. 171–180. Studying Culture Through Data, www.jstor.org/stable/ j.ctt1v2xsqn.17. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  18. Cope, Bill and Mary Kalantzis. “From Literacy to ‘Multiliteracies’: Learning to Mean in the New Communications Environment.” English Studies in Africa 49, no. 1 (2006), 23-45.
  19. Crymble, Adam. “Does your historical collection need a database-driven website?” Digital Humanities Quarterly 9, no. 1 (2015). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/1/000206/000206.html
  20. Drucker, Johanna. “Digital Hybridity and the Question of Aesthetic Opposition.” Bucknell Review 46, no. 2 (2003), 111-24.
  21. Drucker, Johanna. “Theory as Praxis: The Poetics of Electronic Textuality.” Modernism/Modernity 9, no. 4 (2002), 683-91.
  22. Duhaime, Douglas Ernest. “Textual Reuse in the Eighteenth Century: Mining Eliza Haywood’s Quotations.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 10, no. 1 (2016). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/10/1/000229/000229.html
  23. Dunn, Stuart and Mareike Schumacher. “Explaining Events to Computers: Critical Quantification, Multiplicity and Narratives in Cultural Heritage.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 10, no. 3 (2016). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/10/3/000262/000262.html
  24. El Hadi, Widad. “Digital Libraries and Digital Humanities: Some Reflections on their Synergy.” Pakistan Journal of Information Management & Libraries, no. 17, 2016, pp. 13-28. ProQuest, https://search.proquest.com/docview/1822380842?accountid=14512. 
  25. Elias, Amy J. “Interactive Cosmopolitanism and Collaborative Technologies: New Foundations for Global Literary History.” New Literary History 39, no. 3 (2008), 705-725.
  26. Endres, Bill, and Jentery Sayers. “Making in the Digital Humanities.” University of Minnesota Press, 2017, pp. 44–54. Experiments in the Digital Humanities, www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/ j.ctt1pwt6wq.7. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  27. Engel, Deena, and Marion Thain. “Textual Artifacts and their Digital Representations: Teaching Graduate Students to Build Online Archives.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 9, no. 1 (2015). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/1/000199/000199.html
  28. Enoch, Jessica and Jean Bessette. “Meaningful Engagements: Feminist Historiography and the Digital Humanities.” College Composition and Communication 64, no. 4 (2013), 634-660.
  29. Enoch, Jessica and David Gold. “Introduction: Seizing the Methodological Moment: The Digital Humanities and Historiography in Rhetoric and Composition.” College English 78, no. 2 (2013), 104-114.
  30. Enoch, Jessica and David Gold. “The Digital Humanities and Historiography in Rhetoric and Composition.” College English 76, no. 2 (2013), 105-196.
  31. Estrada, Gabriel S. “Native Avatars, Online Hubs, and Urban Indian Literature.” Studies in American Indian Literatures 23, no. 2 (2011), 48-70.
  32. Farrant, Marc, et al. “A New Critical Commons?” OR Books, 2017, pp. 139–152. Literary Culture Online, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt207g899.16. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  33. Fashina, Nelson O. “Lit-Orature Development, World Peace, and the Challenges of Literary Theory/Criticism.” Matatu 39 (2011), 41-56.
  34. Friedman, Marissa A. The Constituency Isn’t Digital: Building and Mobilizing Digital Collections in the 21st Century, University of California, Riverside, Ann Arbor, 2017. ProQuest, https://search.proquest.com/docview/2024642889?accountid=14512. 
  35. Galey, Alan. “Signal to Noise: Designing a Digital Edition of The Taming of a Shrew (1594).” College Literature 36, no. 1 (2009), 40-66.
  36. Galloway, Alexander R. “What is New Media? Ten Years after The Language of New Media.” Criticism 53, no. 3 (2011), 377-384.
  37. Goldman, Dara E. “Virtual Islands: The Reterritorialization of Puerto Rican Spatiality in Cyberspace.” Hispanic Review 72, no. 3 (2004), 375-400.
  38. Gould, Amanda S. Digital Environmental Metabolisms: An Ecocritical Project of the Digital Environmental Humanities, Duke University, Ann Arbor, 2017. ProQuest, https:// search.proquest.com/docview/1894190872?accountid=14512. 
  39. Green, Harriett E., and Patricia Lampron. “User Engagement with Digital Archives for Research and Teaching: A Case Study of Emblematica Online.” Portal : Libraries and the Academy, vol. 17, no. 4, 2017, pp. 759-775. ProQuest, https://search.proquest.com/docview/1986208329? accountid=14512, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2017.0045. 
  40. Grobman, Laurie. “(Re)Writing Local Racial, Ethnic, and Cultural Histories: Negotiating Shared Meaning in Public Rhetoric Partnerships.” College English 77, no. 3 (2015), 236-258.
  41. Hall, Jeanette. “Using a Feminist Digital Humanities Approach: Critical Women’s History through Covers of “Black Coffee”.” Frontiers, vol. 39, no. 1, 2018, pp. 1-23. ProQuest, https:// search.proquest.com/docview/2025302771?accountid=14512. 
  42. Hansen, Mark B. N. “Cinema beyond Cybernetics; or, How to Frame the Digital Image.” Configurations 10, no. 1 (2002), 51-90.
  43. Hayles, N. Katherine. “Translating Media: Why We Should Rethink Textuality.” Yale Journal of Criticism 16, no. 2 (2003), 263-90.
  44. Hayot, Eric. “I/O: A Comparative Literature in a Digital Age.” Comparative Literature 57, no. 3 (2005), 219-26.
  45. Heise, Ursula K. “Unnatural Ecologies: The Metaphor of the Environment in Media Theory.” Configurations 10, no. 1 (2002), 149-68.
  46. Hope, Jonathan and Micheal Witmore. “The Hundredth Psalm to the Tune of ‘Green Sleeves’: Digital Approaches to Shakespeare’s Language of Genre.” Shakespeare Quarterly 61, no. 3 (2010), 357-390.
  47. Hunter, John, et al. “Reifying the Maker as Humanist.” University of Minnesota Press, 2017, pp. 130–138. Experiments in the Digital Humanities, www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1pwt6wq.17. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  48. Kalaga, Wojciech. “The Trouble with the Virtual.” Symploke 11, no. 1-2 (2003), 96-103.
  49. Kennedy, Helen. “Technobiography: Researching Lives, Online and Off.” Biography 26, no. 1 (2003), 120-39.
  51. Koehler, Adam. “Digitizing Craft: Creative Writing Studies and New Media: A Proposal.” College English 75, no. 4 (2013), 379-397.
  52. Koltay, Tibor. “Library and Information Science and the Digital Humanities.” Journal of Documentation, vol. 72, no. 4, 2016, pp. 781-792. ProQuest, https://search.proquest.com/ docview/1795938793?accountid=14512. 
  53. Kottmann, C. “German Studies: The Sixteenth Century.” The Year’s Work in Modern Language Studies 76 (2016), 367-374.
  54. Latham, Sean. “New Age Scholarship: The Work of Criticism in the Age of Digital Reproduction.” New Literary History 35, no. 3 (2004), 411-26.
  55. Leurs, Koen. “Feminist Data Studies: Using Digital Methods for Ethical, Reflexive and Situated Socio-Cultural Research.” Feminist Review, vol. 115, no. 1, 2017, pp. 130-154. ProQuest, https:// search.proquest.com/docview/1905679407?accountid=14512, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/ s41305-017-0043-1. 
  56. Liu, Alan. “Friending the Past: The Sense of History and Social Computing.” New Literary History: A Journal of Theory and Interpretation 42, no. 1 (2011), 1-30.
  57. Losh, Elizabeth. “What can the digital humanities learn from feminist game studies?” Digital Humanities Quarterly 9, no. 2 (2015). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/2/000200/000200.html
  58. Lupton, Deborah, et al. “Personal Data Practices in the Age of Lively Data.” Policy Press at the University of Bristol, 2017, pp. 339–354, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1t89cfr.27. Accessed 1 June 2018.
  59. Lythberg, Billie, et al. “Co-Creating a Digital Contact Network in Theory and Practice.” Boydell and Brewer, 2017, pp. 205–226, www.jstor.org/stable/10.7722/j.ctt1kgqvrc.21. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  60. Martin, Randy. “Taking an Administrative Turn: Derivative Logics for a Recharged Humanities.” Representations 116 (2011), 156-176.
  61. Masson, Eef, et al. “An Encounter between Epistemic Traditions.” Amsterdam University Press, 2017, pp. 25–38. Studying Culture Through Data, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1v2xsqn.6. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  62. McGann, Jerome. “From Text to Work: Digital Tools and the Emergence of the Social Text.” Variants 4 (2005), 225-40.
  63. Migliaccio, Cristina. Language, Materiality and Citizenship in Digital Spaces, St. John’s University (New York), Ann Arbor, 2017. ProQuest, https://search.proquest.com/docview/ 1950220807?accountid=14512. 
  64. Miller, Matthew T., and Sarah B. Savant. “”Tell Me Something I Don’t Know!”: The Place and Politics of Digital Methods in the (Islamicate) Humanities.” International Journal of Middle East Studies, vol. 50, no. 1, 2018, pp. 135-139. ProQuest, https://search.proquest.com/docview/ 1992556168?accountid=14512, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020743817001027. 
  65. Mitchell, W. J. T. “The Work of Art in the Age of Biocybernetic Reproduction.” Modernism/Modernity 10, no. 3 (2003), 481-500.
  66. Nichols, Stephen G. “The Anxiety of Irrelevance: Digital Humanities and Contemporary Critical Theory.” Poetica 45, no. 1-2 (2013), 1-17.
  67. O’Gorman, Francis. “‘Influence’ in the Contemporary Study of the Humanities: The Problem of Ruskin.” Carlyle Studies Annual 28 (2012), 5-29.
  68. O’Gorman, Marcel. E-Crit: Digital Media, Critical Theory and the Humanities. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006.
  69. Orr, Jackie. “Materializing a Cyborg’s Manifesto.” WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly 40, no. 1-2 (2012), 273-280.
  70. Poole, Alex H. “The Conceptual Ecology of Digital Humanities.” Journal of Documentation, vol. 73, no. 1, 2017, pp. 91-122. ProQuest, https://search.proquest.com/docview/1850710555? accountid=14512. 
  71. Poster, Mark. “Global Media and Culture.” New Literary History 39, no. 3 (2008), 685-703.
  72. Raley, Rita. “Machine Translation and Global English.” Yale Journal of Criticism 16, no. 2 (2003), 291-313.
  73. Ray, Robert B. “Film Studies and the Problems of the New Century.” New England Review: Middlebury Series 27, no. 4 (2006), 106-20.
  74. Resch, Gabby, et al. “Critical Making with Humanistic Concerns.” University of Minnesota Press, 2017, pp. 149–161. Experiments in the Digital Humanities, www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/ j.ctt1pwt6wq.19. Accessed 1 June 2018. 
  75. Rice, Jeff. “Occupying the Digital Humanities.” College English 75, no. 4 (2013), 360-378.
  76. Ridolfo, Jim. “Delivering Textual Diaspora: Building Digital Cultural Repositories as Rhetoric Research.” College English 76, no. 2 (2013), 136-151.
  77. Risam, Roopika. “Beyond the Margins: Intersectionality and the Digital Humanities.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 9, no. 2 (2015). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/2/000208/000208.html
  78. Robinson, Peter. “Towards a Theory of Digital Editions.” Variants 10 (2013), 105-131.
  79. Romanello, Matteo. “Exploring Citation Networks to Study Intertextuality in Classics.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 10, no. 2 (2016). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/10/2/000255/000255.html
  80. Rumbold, Kate Louise. “From ‘Access’ to ‘Creativity’: Shakespeare Institutions, New Media, and the Language of Cultural Value.” Shakespeare Quarterly 61, no. 3 (2010), 313-336.
  81. Ruiz, Stevie, et al. “Radicalizing the Digital Humanities: Reimagining Environmental Justice Research and Teaching.” Radical Teacher, no. 109, 2017, pp. 29-37,63. ProQuest, https:// search.proquest.com/docview/1946267187?accountid=14512, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/rt. 2017.395. 
  82. Russell, Isabel Galina. “Creating a regional DH community – A Case Study of the RedHD.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 9, no. 3 (2015). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/3/000221/000221.html
  83. Searle, Leroy F. “Technology and the Perils of Poetry; or, Why Criticism Never Catches Up.” MLN 118, no. 5 (2003), 1177-92.
  84. Selber, Stuart A. “Postcritical Perspectives on Literacy Technologies.” College English 67, no. 3 (2005), 331-39.
  85. Stauffer, Andrew. “Evidence and Interpretation in the Digital Age.” Victorian Studies 54, no. 1 (2011), 63-68.
  86. Ullyot, Michael. 2013. “Review Essay: Digital Humanities Project.” Renaissance Quarterly 66, no. 3 (2013), 937-947.
  87. Veel, Kristin. “The Irreducibility of Space: Labyrinths, Cities, Cyberspace.”
    Diacritics 33, no. 3-4 (2003), 151-72.
  88. Voyce, Stephen. “Toward an Open Source Poetics: Appropriation, Collaboration, and the Commons.” Criticism 53, no. 3 (2011), 407-438.
  89. Wang, Ning. “Humanities Encounters Science: Confronting the Challenge of Post-Humanism.” European Review, vol. 26, no. 2, 2018, pp. 344-353. ProQuest, https://search.proquest.com/ docview/2027527598?accountid=14512, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1062798717000722. 
  90. Warren, Christopher N., Daniel Shore, Jessica Otis, Lawrence Wang, Mike Finegold, and Cosma Shalizi. “Six Degrees of Francis Bacon: A Statistical Method for Reconstructing Large Historical Social Networks.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 10, no. 3 (2016). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/10/3/000244/000244.html
  91. Werner, Marta L. “‘A Woe of Ecstasy’: On the Electronic Editing of Emily Dickinson’s Late Fragments.” Emily Dickinson Journal 16, no. 2 (2007), 25-52.
  92. Whitelaw, Mitchell. “Generous Interfaces for Digital Cultural Collections.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 9, no. 1 (2015). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/1/000205/000205.html
  93. Winthrop-Young, Geoffrey. “Media, Materiality, Memory: Aspects of Intermediality.” Configurations 10, no. 1 (2002), 1-201.
  94. Wulfman, Clifford E. “The Perseus Garner: Early Modern Resources in the Digital Age.” College Literature 36, no. 1 (2009), 18-25.
  95. Zahora, Tomas, Dmitri Nikulin, Constant J. Mews, and David Squire. “Deconstructing Bricolage: Interactive Online Analysis of Complied Texts with Factotum.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 9, no. 1 (2015). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/1/000203/000203.html

Leave a Reply